August 06, 2004

The Swiftboat Testimony: Is This Really Beyond the Pale?

There's a good deal of controversy about a really brutal new TV ad that features a number of swiftboat commanders who "served with" John Kerry. Their contention is that Kerry did not deserve the medals he was awarded. I heard one MSNBC announcer make the observation that the "only sense in which these men served with Kerry is that they fought in the same war." That is, in fact, the claim that the Kerry Campaign is making, as it threatens to sue stations that air the ad.

But, one of Glenn's readers notes that the men featured in the ad were in the same unit. Furthermore, at least one of them (Larry Thurlow) was present on the day and time when Kerry is aledged to have rescued Jim Rassman, earning him a silver star. Judy Woodruff interviewed both men on her CNN show Inside Politics, a transcript of which is located here. Since the transcript includes interviews and discussions of a number of other issues I have extracted the relevant portion below, followed by more commentary.

Extracted from a transcript of Judy Woodruff's Inside Politics which aired on CNN August 5, 2004 - 15:30 ET

WOODRUFF: We've been reporting on the debate between Vietnam veterans for and against John Kerry. With me now, two central figures in this debate. Larry Thurlow, he's with me here in Washington. Like John Kerry, he commanded a swift boat in Vietnam. He appears in that anti-Kerry television ad that we showed you a little earlier.

In Eugene, Oregon, is Jim Rassmann. He served under John Kerry's command and he credits Kerry with saving his life. Rassmann, you may remember, spoke at last week's Democratic convention.

Larry Thurlow, I want to -- I want to begin with you. You essentially, as I understand it, you, too, won a Bronze Star, like John Kerry did. The incident in which John Kerry pulled Jim Rassmann out of -- out of the river...

LARRY THURLOW, APPEARS IN ANTI-KERRY AD: Yes? WOODRUFF: ... in Vietnam, Kerry says that this happened under enemy fire, that Rassmann had been knocked in the water, he went back and was the first to get to Rassmann and pulled him out of the water. You essentially said that's not what happened. What are you saying?

THURLOW: My recollection of that day is still pretty vivid after all these years. And what I remember, Judy, is that the incident involving Mr. Rassmann, five boats had come out of the river after running an operation up in the canal earlier that day. Three boats were going through a fishing weir on the left side of the river that had put in place between the time we entered and when we were leaving.

I'm the third boat in that column left. In the column right, there are two boats. The lead boat is John Kerry's.

He's going through a rather small opening on the right bank that (ph) had been left in his boat. The boat leading our column, as it goes through that small opening almost simultaneously, is blasted completely out of the water by a command detonated mine.

WOODRUFF: This is another boat?

THURLOW: This is a 3-boat (ph) -- this is on the opposite side of the river of John Kerry's boat. At this point, John Kerry speeds out of the area, I assume to clear the kill zone. The rest of the boats, however, went to the aid of the 3-boat (ph), which was completely disabled. Two members of that crew are in the water, the rest are badly wounded and basically incapacitated on board that boat.

WOODRUFF: You're basically saying he fled when there was...

(CROSSTALK)

THURLOW: I am saying he fled the area on the explosion under the 3-boat (ph).

WOODRUFF: All right. Well, before -- and let me ask Jim Rassmann about that part of the story before we ask what happened to him.

Jim Rassmann, what -- what do you say happened that day in March, 1969?

JIM RASSMANN, KERRY SUPPORTER: Well, first, I was not part of John Kerry's command. I was a Special Forces officer who happened to be on his boat at that time.

Mr. Thurlow's recollection of what occurred is not accurate. We had the boat hit the mine to our left. And John immediately had his driver, Del Sandusky (ph), turn to the left and head towards it.

And it was at that time that our gunner on the bow got his gun knocked out and he started screaming for another weapon. I ran another weapon up to me, and we hit something or something hit us. There was an explosion, and I was blown off the boat to the right.

WOODRUFF: And you ended up in the water how?

RASSMANN: I was blown into the water, and I had boats coming up behind me. So, I went to the bottom of the river.

WOODRUFF: Now, as I understand it, Larry Thurlow, you have a different version of how Jim Rassmann was in the water.

THURLOW: Yes, I do. My thought is that since no mine was detected on the other side of the river, no blast was seen, no noise heard, there's two things that are inconsistent with my memory.

Our boats immediately put automatic weapons fire on to the left bank just in case there was an ambush in conjunction with the mine. It soon became apparent there was no ambush.

The rescue efforts began on the 3-boat (ph). And at this time, the second boat in line, mine being the third boat on the left bank, began to do this.

Now, two members in this boat, keep in mind, are in the river at that time. They're picked up. The boat that picks them up starts toward Lieutenant Rassmann at this time, that's the 23-boat (ph). But before they get there, John does return and pick him up. But I distinctly remember we were under no fire from either bank.

WOODRUFF: Jim Rassmann, what about that? You hear Mr. Thurlow saying there was no enemy fire at that point.

RASSMANN: Mr. Thurlow is being disingenuous. I don't know what his motivation is, but I was receiving fire in the water every time I came up for air. I don't recall anybody being in the area around us until I came up maybe five or six times for air and Kerry came back to pick me up out of the water.

WOODRUFF: Disingenuous. He says you are being disingenuous in not recalling what happened.

THURLOW: Let me ask Mr. Rassmann this question: I also ended up in the water that day during the rescue efforts on the 3-boat (ph). And my boat, the 51-boat (ph), came up, picked me up, business as usual. I got back on board, went about the business at hand.

I received no fire. But the thing I would like to ask is, we have five boats now, John's returning, and four boats basically dead in the water, working on the 3-boat (ph). If we were receiving fire off the bank, how come not one single boat received one bullet hole, nobody was hit, no sign of any rounds hitting the water while I was in it?

WOODRUFF: What about that, Jim Rassmann, quickly?

RASSMANN: There were definitely rounds hitting the water around me. If Mr. Thurlow feels that what his story is purported to be was the case, he had ample opportunity 35 years ago to deal with it. He never did, nor did anyone else. John Kerry did not tell this story. I told this story when I put him in for a Silver Star for coming back to rescue me. The Navy saw fit to reduce it to a Bronze Star for valor.

That's OK with me. But If Mr. Furlow had a problem with that, he should have dealt with it long, long ago. To bring it up now, I think, is very disingenuous. I think that this is partisan motivation on his part and for the part of his whole organization.

WOODRUFF: Mr. Thurlow, why didn't you bring this up earlier?

THURLOW: For one thing, I did not know that John had been put in for a Bronze Star, a Silver Star or, for that matter, a Purple Heart on that day. I did not see the after-action report, which, in fact, was written by John. And as the years went by, John was not running for the highest office in the free world.

WOODRUFF: What about Mr. Rassmann's point that he thinks you're doing this for partisan purposes?

THURLOW: Well, this is not true because, the fact of the matter is, I have not been active in any political party since I got out of the service. In fact, I basically turned my back on politics because of my experience in the service.

WOODRUFF: But this -- you feel strongly enough about this to be out?

THURLOW: I certainly do. My point is, is that John Kerry, because of the actions he's taken, and then the fantastic stories he made up about this, when many people beside myself know this not to be true, negates him being the leader he claims to be. And I would hate to have him be the commander-in-chief over my grandchildren.

WOODRUFF: Jim Rassmann, you want to respond to that?

RASSMANN: I sure do. I have two wonderful kids. They're very bright, they're compassionate people. I'm here today not just because John Kerry pulled me out of that water. I'm here today because if those two kids of mine were in the military, I would want John Kerry to be the commander-in-chief, not George Bush.

I think that Mr. Thurlow has a very unusual recollection of the events. I think that it's important to note that even today John McCain has come out and called this ad that they have produced dishonest and dishonorable. And I think I would have to agree with him.

WOODRUFF: Well, gentlemen, we are going to have to leave it there. Mr. Jim Rassmann, we thank you for joining us from Eugene, Oregon.

Larry Thurlow, we thank you for joining us here in Washington. We know you're from Kansas. We appreciate it.

And I have a sense we're going to continue to hear more about this story in the days and the weeks to come. Gentlemen, thank you very much.

THURLOW: You're welcome.

WOODRUFF: We appreciate it.

Well, even though John McCain has condemned the ad, at first blush it seems to me that Thurlow is making a plausible case. Moreover, I was not aware that it was Kerry himself who filed the after-action report that led to his own medal. It's clearly a "he said she said" argument between these two men, neither of whom were crewmates of Kerry, but with Rassmann in and under the water during much of the period when the critical events were supposed to have transpired, it's possible that he missed Kerry's evacuation of the kill zone, and was only aware of his return.

The Kerry folks are protesting a great deal. Perhaps too much. As readers on Instatpundit make clear, Kerry is throwing out a lot of chaff, but the accusations aren't far fetched. A number of political pundits, including Dick Morris, the Clintons' pollster and advisor, think this is dangerous territory for the Bush Campaign. I suppose, from the perspective of pure political expediency, getting too close to this story could backfire on Bush. But quite apart from those political questions we voters have some interest in the truth, even if the candidates and campaigns prefer to steer clear. After all we're the ones who must make the decision about who leads us during this critical period of history, not them. And given the central role of Kerry's Vietnam war record in the campaign I'd like to see a bit more about this before deciding, once and for all, to leave it behind.

Of course, I only have one vote.

Update: The ad that's the center of the controversy can be viewed here, and a chapter from the Unfit for Command book is located here. (Hat tip: Dr. Rusty, who has additional commentary as well as a plethora of links to discussion and information.)

Posted by Demosophist at August 6, 2004 12:04 AM | TrackBack
Comments

Hey Scott, Qando has chapter 3 of the forthcoming book posted on his site. It's the chapter on the Purple Hearts (not the bronze medal) but it's good.

Posted by: Rusty Shackleford at August 6, 2004 01:13 AM

If other men were pulled out of the water during that incident, such rescues would have been under the same heroic conditions as Kerry's rescue of Rassmann, wouldn't they? Were medals given to any of the other heroes who pulled men out of the water?

Posted by: UpNights at August 8, 2004 05:52 AM

You asked over at the Captainsblogspot why none of this came out 30 or so years ago-very simply-Military Personnel were not ALLOWED to make ANY political comments back then, and these guys were STILL on Active Duty when The Poodle was testifying before Congress-many of them probably never saw the Tesimony, if they were still in Vietrnam!!!!!! Military People can NOW work on campaigns, etc., as long as they aren't "on camera" as an Active Duty person, or in uniform-but their participation in politics is STILL very LIMITED....I've been retired since '87, so I may not be up on more recent changes, but I doubt it has gotten any more lenient.........

Posted by: J. Pietrzak at August 10, 2004 12:51 AM

I think the link you meant to post for the original source is here:

http://cnnstudentnews.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0408/05/ip.01.html

Posted by: Anon at August 13, 2004 06:23 PM

Turns out Thurlow's own Bronze star citation says the boats were receiving enemy fire. I suppose he didn't know about THAT either until Kerry decided to run for president.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13267-2004Aug18.html

Looks like it's been solidly established that Thurlow is a liar. Oh, that pesky Freedom of Information Act...

Posted by: Anon at August 19, 2004 02:39 PM
Turns out Thurlow's own Bronze star citation says the boats were receiving enemy fire. I suppose he didn't know about THAT either until Kerry decided to run for president.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A13267-2004Aug18.html

Looks like it's been solidly established that Thurlow is a liar. Oh, that pesky Freedom of Information Act...

Well, whatever. The citation says that he was under fire, but it's not creal that this means Kerry was. For that matter its entirely possible that Turner simply never knew what the citation said, specifically, and that it simply reflects the disinformation that was in Kerry's report.

Well who knows? And frankly who cares. The whole issue of the medals, it seems to me, is that they serve as a distraction from this "Christmas in Cambodia" story, where we know Kerry repeatedly misrepresented an event that he claims was a central experience of his life. It simply did not happen in the way he has represented it for years, and in fact there's absolutely no evidence that it ever happened. The issues with regard to the medals are obscure, and will often depend on information no longer available. But the "Christmas in Cambodia" story is absolutely clear, and leads to one of two conclusions. Either:

1. Kerry is able to unintentionally delude himself about the circumnstances, so that he can see things as he wants to see them; or

2. He deliberately misleads himself and/or others about critical events.

And neither of those traits are particularly good in a President.

Posted by: Demosophist at August 19, 2004 08:12 PM